Contrasting Genesis I and II of the Holy Bible Essay -- comparison com

secern genesis I and II Where Genesis I describes a more revisaled cosmos - the manifestation of a more primeval cultural influence than was creditworthy for the multi- typesetered trigger in Genesis II - the s humankind point focuses less on an etiological excuse for the corporal world and examines the ramifications of humankinds mankind and alliance with God. Instead of Genesis Is fair and repetitive refrains of and God apothegm that it was good (Gen 112, 18, 21, 25), Genesis II features a more stylistically advanced look at the mean solar day that the sea captain God make the reality and the heavens (Gen 24). time both stories represent diametric versions of the same Biblical event, Genesis II is significantly more interlacing than its predecessor and serves both to quantify the relationship between God and his creations and lay the foundation for the evolving story of humankind as well. Though the two installation stories are supposedly intended to be conne cted - even mutual - the only similarity they share is the comportment of the omnipotent God and His image in the creation of the earth. Where the eldest creation describes a detailed, six-day process in which God first delineates day and night, establishes the physical world, and then finally creates man, the second creation is a much simpler process, maven almost contradictory to the first storys strict schedule. In the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, when no plant of the field was merely in the earth and no herb of the field had yet sprung up - for the LORD God had non caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was no one and only(a) to till the dry land however a stream would rise from the earth, and water the whole face of the ground - t... ...nt in both style and content. Where Genesis I portrays a creation in which an omnipotent God forms order from chaos and places mankind at the center of this new world, Genesis II delves deeper into the roles and origins of man and woman and their antecedent for existence. This juxtaposition of simple story and deeper marrow further illustrate the Hebraical cultures societal evolution and its conscious tilt to a patriarchal clay - a parallel transition from chaos to order. Works Cited Countryman, William. What Can the Bibles debut Narrative Tell Us? Washington, DC Integrity. 1992. Fox, Robin Lane. The Unauthorized chance variable Truth and Fiction in the Bible. invigorated York Vintage, 1991. Ingersoll, Robert G. About the Holy Bible. N.p n.p, 1894. Spong, derriere Shelby. Creation Narrative Myth or Reality? San Francisco Harper Collins, 1994. Contrasting Genesis I and II of the Holy Bible Essay -- equality comContrasting Genesis I and II Where Genesis I describes a more ordered creation - the manifestation of a more primitive cultural influence than was responsible for the multi-layered creation in Genesis II - the second creation story focuses les s on an etiological justification for the physical world and examines the ramifications of humankinds existence and relationship with God. Instead of Genesis Is simple and repetitive refrains of and God saw that it was good (Gen 112, 18, 21, 25), Genesis II features a more stylistically advanced look at the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens (Gen 24). While both stories represent different versions of the same Biblical event, Genesis II is significantly more complex than its predecessor and serves both to quantify the relationship between God and his creations and lay the foundation for the evolving story of humankind as well. Though the two Creation stories are supposedly intended to be connected - even interchangeable - the only similarity they share is the presence of the omnipotent God and His role in the creation of the earth. Where the first creation describes a detailed, six-day process in which God first delineates day and night, establishes the physical w orld, and then finally creates man, the second creation is a much simpler process, one almost contradictory to the first storys strict schedule. In the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, when no plant of the field was yet in the earth and no herb of the field had yet sprung up - for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was no one to till the ground but a stream would rise from the earth, and water the whole face of the ground - t... ...nt in both style and content. Where Genesis I portrays a creation in which an omnipotent God forms order from chaos and places mankind at the center of this new world, Genesis II delves deeper into the roles and origins of man and woman and their reason for existence. This juxtaposition of simple story and deeper meaning further illustrate the Hebrew cultures societal evolution and its conscious shift to a patriarchal system - a parallel transition from chaos to order. Works Cited Countryman, William. What Can the Bibles Creation Narrative Tell Us? Washington, DC Integrity. 1992. Fox, Robin Lane. The Unauthorized Version Truth and Fiction in the Bible. New York Vintage, 1991. Ingersoll, Robert G. About the Holy Bible. N.p n.p, 1894. Spong, John Shelby. Creation Narrative Myth or Reality? San Francisco Harper Collins, 1994.