Knowledge Development In Nursing

Knowledge development in nursing has been somewhat of a hot topic in the much scholastic endeavors of the profession for quite some time. As the profession grew from a focus centered on treating physical symptoms and conditions to a more well-rounded advancement that considered psychological, social, and spiritual needs in addition to physical illness, the need to break down the process of knowledge development arose.By utilizing nursing theories, which support the use of testify based practice in most cases, it seems as though the profession of nursing gained more credibility in the scientific community as cold as the value of the knowledge produced I feel that utilizing processes akin to those already accepted as prudent by more established scientific handle helped achieve that credibility.In order to get to nursing theories, however, the process had to begin with a philosophic component that heap allow for a separation from concrete/ scientific knowledge, among other things , in order to promote more abstract concepts and different methods to look at how we come to that knowledge. McCurry (2009) touches on this premise as she describes how a vernacular theme, in this case the common good of society, can be looked at from many different perspectives, as it creates an arena in which those perspectives can be pose to determine how to go ab emerge investigating the perspectives further.Although it wasnt the center piece of the article, one highlight was a breakdown of how more abstract thoughts can be linked to the application of intentional actions through the use of theories, which stems from philosophical questions. Philosophy lays the ground work for knowledge production to be built upon. In a way, Kim (1999) echoed these sentiments as she discusses critical reflective inquiry and its applications in relation to pain management in a South Korean hospital setting.She admits that nursing has situations in which our therapeutic actions can be supported by one theory and conflicted by a nonher. What it seemed to re-enforce was how our drive to answer the philosophical questions created by the issues we wish to address can use various forms to achieve that common goal, however, those that are centered around the evaluation of how our therapeutic actions actually pan out versus how we think they pan out will help us gain the most useful knowledge as long as we are able to recognize the need for, and pull ahead of, changes that help our patients out the most.We wouldnt be able to gain the knowledge that specific actions and changes are therapeutically beneficial without understanding why we wanted to trade name changes in the first place, and generating multiple attempts at making those changes to see which ones actually accomplished the goal would seemingly allow us to ask the ruff dislodge at achieving what we set out to.Evaluating the nursing interventions we utilize to affect our patients for the better is important, we all k now that. Abbott (1988) pointed out that although nursing is capable of evaluating our interventions in practice, we do not tend to emphasize the importance of breaking down specific practical interventions in an abstract way that allows for our ability to link the interventions we utilize to the thought processes lavatory it while we are out practicing our craft.This I can personally relate to, when considering how the first couple years of my personal practice was spent learning how to but accomplish the tasks I was presented with in the time frame I was to accomplish them in (assessment, documenting, intervening, documenting, evaluating, intervening, documenting, documenting, documentingugh). I knew that there was good reason behind the things I was doing however, I was not keenly aware of the concepts and philosophies that comprised that reasoning, I was simply focused on completing my tasks in a timely, safe fashion.Reed (2006) promotes the idea that nurses tend not to perpl ex a full understanding of the why we do the things we do, and went so far as to say that there might be a level of mysticism when it comes to the healing processes we are engaged in. That mysticism was essentially summed up by purporting that when we cant put our finger on the why we do what we do, we bowling pin back on concepts like intuition and gut feelings. Its not to say that we are incorrect in our intuitions, however, we dont have a strong link to the rationale behind it all the time.This is where the concept of breaking down the why we do what we do into more abstract, philosophical components can rightfully benefit us, as we can extrapolate on the intuitions and gut feelings into philosophical questions and building blocks that theories can be generated from. When we utilize practice centered theories that arise from abstract, philosophical questions, the whole process of nursing can be explained and evaluated with more ease, and the knowledge we generate could be seen as more credible.Just saying something is true because it is doesnt have a whole lot of weight behind it showing how the knowledge we reference as truth comes to be and having evidence that supports it with results that highlight it is, by and large, the best way that nursing knowledge can be produced in a fashion that holds credibility with those that arent of our discipline. We know how awesome we are, but its trying to prove it to others without a process that everyone can relate to that all starts with philosophy.