A Midsummer’s Night Dream: A review

A Midsummers dark Dream is i of Shakespeargons most popular comedies. in that location are thousands of versions of the play originated from genuinely different interpretations of the text. In this detail adaptation, the film director, Joan Ollé, opted to focus on the makeup of the eroticism and the fishy post of the play. The eroticism is mainly equal by puck and titanium oxide and back tooth. Pucks movements are rattling sensual and cozy as well. He is delineated as a blowzy character, very extrovert and with no shame. The relationship of Titania and Bottom is much eroticized too. Titania is delineate as a fat woman and Bottom is robed with a red velvet robe and smoking a cigar, which made me esteem of Hugh Hefner and one of his trophy girls. The funny position of the play is reinforced especially by the workers, who speak in a very inner way, with different accents from different move of Catalonia, and acting in a dumb way. I intend that one of the key fu nny moments is when they appear dressed as Snow White and the dwarfs. \nI do not think that the characters have been modified very much. It is true, though, that Demetrius and Lysander looked younger than what I anticipate them to be. Moreover, one of them carries a scooter and they wear a confuse and shorts, which is what little boy wears. equivalence them to the girls, they look older than they, and their habilitate reinforce that aspect, since they wear liquid or revealing dresses. Puck is much sexualized than in the text, and in any(prenominal) scene it looked as if he was in some kind of relationship with Oberon, muchover it was not very clear. gender politics are not really made patent in this version since the director wanted to focus more on other aspects. However, I missed the strength of Hyppolita. In Shakespeares text there is a slight oppositeness to marry from Hyppolitas pop that was not very stand for in this adaptation. The young couples were the ones wh o were more important...