An Evaluation Of The Current Pre And Post Deployment Health Surveillance Programs Of The United States Navy And Marine Corps

Running Head : AN EVALUATION OF THE CURRENT PRE AND POSTAn evaluation of the consecutive pre and post deployment wellness inspection syllabuss of the coupled States naval tugs and shipboard soldier Corps[Author s Name][Institution s Name] An evaluation of the current pre and post deployment wellness surveillance courses of the united States Navy and ocean CorpsOverall compliance with defence s force wellness protection and surveillance policies for serve well members that deployed in avow of OIF vary by portion , installation , and policy extremity . such(prenominal) policies require that overhaul members be assessed before and subsequently deploying overseas and receive certain immunizations , and that wellness-related documentation be maintained in a centralise location . GAO reviewed 1 ,862 active avocatio n and selected reserve component redevelopment members medical exam records from a universe of discourse of 4 ,316 at selected military servicing installations participating in OIF . Overall , military and atmospheric call forth crash compliance for sampled service members for OIF appears much better compared to OEF and OJG . For archetype refuse percentages of troops and Air Force service members were absentminded pre- and post-deployment health assessments for OIF Higher percentages of Army and Air Force service members received required pre-deployment immunizations for OIF Lower percentages of deployment health-related documentation were missing in service members permanent medical records and at defence s centralized database for OIFThe Marine Corps installations examined broadly had lower levels of compliance than the other serve however , GAO did non review medical records from the Marines or Navy for OEF and OJG . Noncompliance with the requirements for h ealth assessments may result in deployment ! of service members with existing health paradoxs or concerns that are unaddressed It may also watch appropriate medical follow-up for a health problem or concern that may nourish arisen during or after deploymentIn January 2004 , DOD established an overall deployment lineament government agency program for ensuring that the services comply with force health protection and surveillance policies , and implementation of the program is on-going .

DOD s role authority program requires (1 ) account from DOD s centralized database on each(prenominal) service s submission of required pre deployment and post-deploym ent health assessments for deployed service members (2 ) reporting from each service regarding the results of the individual service s deployment quality potency program , and (3 ) joint DOD and service representative reviews at selected military installations to validate the service s deployment health quality pledge reporting . DOD officials believe that their quality confidence program has improved the services compliance with requirementsHowever , the services are at different stages of implementing their own quality assurance programs as mandated by DOD . At the installations visited , GAO analysts observed that the Army and Air Force had centralized quality assurance processes in place that extensively involved medical personnel examining whether DOD s force health protection and surveillance requirements were met for deploying /redeployingService members . In oppose , GAO analysts observed that the Marine Corps installations did not have clear(p) quality assurance proces ses for ensuring that requirements were met for servi! ce members Our review disclosed that the fulfilment of policy compliance...If you desire to get a full essay, range it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper